Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HiT Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HiT Software[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY.Has a few links but they seem to be missing and coverage based on company press announcments, ie "HiT Software, Inc....has announced" ect. A Google news search only turns up press releases. Hu12 (talk) 02:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another commercial software development company. Their chief product is apparently a graphical database replication software product for heterogeneous relational databases, that provides real-time data migration, data mapping, data updates, bi-directional data synchronization, change data capture, data transformation, mirroring, refresh and batch support for production servers, operational data stores, data marts, data warehouses, and business intelligence. Anything with that many buzzwords to plug into the description obviously isn't a groundbreaking or history-making product, and as such this article makes no case for significant effects on history, technology, or culture. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.