Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hevonkakki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of islands of Finland. I would close it as merge but there's nothing to merge. (non-admin closure) ansh666 23:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hevonkakki[edit]

Hevonkakki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A small island that sports a somewhat amusing name in Finnish. To cite the edit summary of the person who created the article: "Translates to 'Horse Shit!' LOL". No significant coverage in independent reliable sources (WP:GNG). Google draws only weather data. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 21:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep perhaps simply because Wikipedia includes geography locations including islands and I would've also suggested merging elsewhere but there's no obvious suggestion. 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Yes, provided that "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist" (WP:GEOLAND) - and I've found nothing, SwisterTwister only weather data. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 11:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 05:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.