Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heshy Fried

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heshy Fried[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG Two stories, from minor sources about the subject. a few more in passing references, also from minor sources. Doesn't meet the criteria imo. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 14:56, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom needs more. -- GreenC 02:19, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Here's significant coverage in a book called The New Jewish Leaders: Reshaping the American Jewish Landscape, written by respected historian Jack Wertheimer. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Three out of seven links are dead. One is a link to the subject's own blog, does not discuss the subject, and thus is inappropriate as a reference. Three references are decent, but insufficient for me to recommend retention. I am hoping that an author can fix or supplement.--Rpclod (talk) 02:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mr Granger, for fixing the dead links. Unfortunately, the three revived references merely mention the subject in passing and are not sources of information regarding the subject. With only three references, I will remain on the fence.--Rpclod (talk) 13:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep With two Google Books links showing (The New Jewish Leaders: Reshaping the American Jewish Landscape, and The Ashgate Research Companion to Contemporary Religion), and no disclaimer in the nomination, despite comprehensive criticism of the sources currently in the article, it is clear the nomination has not fulfilled WP:BEFORE. "The minimum search expected is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects. Such searches should in most cases take only a minute or two to perform." It is necessary for nominators to explore what sources MAY BE FOUND TO EXIST, whether or not they actually add them to the article (as is preferable). Furthermore, the regular link in the Find Sources list has literally dozens of links to sources of all types, showing attention from more than a niche community-Jewish Orthodox sites to Jewish criticism sites to sites about comedy to gay sites. Anarchangel (talk) 02:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I also found some coverage in gourmet cooking sources, Anarchangel. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.