Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hertford British Hospital Charity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is no option for "marginal keep". But according to the consensus here, there should be. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hertford British Hospital Charity[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor source. Not notable. Siddiqsazzad001 </Talk> 17:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have just moved this article to Hertford British Hospital. The basic history is - Notable British Hospital in France for 100+ years - the hospital gets absorbed into French Health System and disappears - what is left is a charity of no importance. The article is now about the hospital. Szzuk (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~*Delete~~ - Per WP:NHOSPITALS, I can only see one trivial independent source. I search the net but are just routine mentions, news neither. If there are any more sources, I will be willing to change the vote. Quek157 (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further Comment- what to do with the redirect as this page is moved during this Afd, the redirect should also be deleted if this is deleted. No one cares to give anymore sources??? --Quek157 (talk) 19:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:07, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Weak Keep English Millionaire of Paris - and the Hertford British Hospital sounds like it might be a decent covering source. If anyone can find access bonus points await.

Access on that might be tricky, but anyone with either direct or library access should be able to get to Lancet - HBH in Paris (1), Lancet - HBH in Paris (2) or most encouragingly Lancet Vol 1 Part 1 - with encouraging snippet view. I despise trying to make a !vote on notability when there are potential sources in the offing, so any details much desired Nosebagbear (talk) 15:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've switched mine to a weak keep - however if someone could get some better access that would be greatly appreciated. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

weak KeepRemoved my delete vote upon discovery of new sources (which is what I am waiting for), but will need someone to read or access those sources, prima facie case of notablity is established, promising development --Quek157 (talk) 15:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC) with these sources a marginal keep can be established, this is already relisted 3 times and no need a fourth --Quek157 (talk) 11:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.