Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herschel Jacobs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Herschel Jacobs[edit]

Herschel Jacobs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer who fails the GNG because of a lack of significant coverage. Winning a state boxing title doesn't show notability nor is there significant coverage of him as a trainer. I didn't find him ever listed by Ring Magazine as a top 10 contender, so he fails WP:NBOX. No supporting evidence found in a reliable source he was a world top 10 boxer for any major organization. Jakejr (talk) 19:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete perhaps at best as my searches found nothing better than a few links here and there, nothing outstanding though. Notifying speedy tagger NottNott. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.