Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herring Networks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 07:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Herring Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a relatively obscure but emerging company that is only notable for AWE Network and the one news network that always spreads extreme right-wing conspiracy theories and disinformation while earnestly thinking that the governments of Russia and Syria are better than American "liberals". Barely reads more than a dictionary term, which is unacceptable. GaɱingFørFuɲ365 03:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. GaɱingFørFuɲ365 03:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GaɱingFørFuɲ365 03:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I am skeptical of the assertion that a network that is "only notable for AWE Network and the one news network that always spreads extreme right-wing conspiracy theories and disinformation" is, therefore, not notable. Surely a network can be notable for spreading "extreme right-wing conspiracy theories and disinformation," as this one appears to be. Here are 2 articles in the New York Times [1]. The network gets coverage in the Times of San Diego [2].NotButtigieg (talk) 07:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This company is the proprietor of two different television networks one in entertainment the other in politics. The political tendency should have no relevance as a reason for deletion. werldwayd (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.