Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heroic bloodshed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (nomination withdrawn), by JJL. Non-admin close. JJL (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heroic bloodshed[edit]

This article appears to be entirely original research and/ or a neologisms as the only citation listed appears to be a self published web article/essay. I did a Google search for references, but most of the hits I found were either sites quoting Wikipedia or web sites solely devoted to the Hong Kong Action genre. I do love these movies. Several of them are among my favorite films, but I would like to see some reliable sources for this before it is kept. Slavlin (talk) 03:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep term is used [1] but not sure how widely. JJL (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Unfortunately, an AOL members page article does not make a reliable source. Slavlin (talk) 04:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added some refs on the article. I assume that the nom doesn't want to cause other people to fix the article for him because he's too lazy to do so. So I'll leave this link for him to use in the article. Cheers--Lenticel ^(talk) 06:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Try to stay civil. The nom is under no obligation to fix the article. Mandsford (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I cited the book Hong Kong's Heroic Bloodshed which says it all. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn: With the citations listed now, I see support for it not being a neologism. Lenticel, you are not really assuming good faith by implying that I am being lazy, especially since I did say that I tried to find some references through a google search. I just didn't happen to find those books (which I actually may wind up getting.) Slavlin (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.