Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heroic Origins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heroic Origins[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This may be a notable episode of the comedy series Community from its gas leak season, with its the article having multiple issues, if it were to avoid deletion, I don’t know it would be best to WP:BLOWITUP as the article has multiple problems that were brought up a few months after the episode first aired. Pahiy (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable enough of an episode to justify a seperate article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. If the plot summary sucks, fix it, don't take it to AfD, especially when you haven't even given an indication of doing a WP:BEFORE. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as no deletion rationale is given by nominator. Lack of reason to delete is a reason to keep. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per PMC. I see no particular reason to delete given here, other than "the article having multiple issues". WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons above. I would recommend that if the article needs work, be bold and work on the article. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.