Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heroes (TV Show)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Heroes (TV Show)[edit]
Future TV show. WP:NOT crystal ball. Delete ::Supergolden:: 15:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Jusjih 15:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NOT. --Terence Ong 16:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the arrow of time.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The pilot has an IMDB entry [1] and a number of notable actors. RGTraynor 21:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment what if the show comes out and absolutely flops and is quickly cancelled, causing barely a notable ripple, or is pulled before coming out (which happens all the time). Can you imagine voting to delete this article upon the unfolding of those future events? If the answer to that is other than an unqualified negative, isn't a prospective article about the show all the more unencyclopedic as ill-advised speculation? --Fuhghettaboutit 22:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Why, yes, I can imagine voting to delete something which 20:20 hindsight has deemed non-notable; why not? For instance, I'm looking forward to the AfDs a year or two from now where a lot of pop culture fad articles become vulnerable, when people realize how desperately unencyclopedic many are. We're entitled to change our minds, and furthermore we shouldn't be afraid to do so as situations warrant. RGTraynor 00:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The "pop culture fads" are annoying, but its the "internet memes" that'll be first against the wall. -- GWO
- Comment - Why, yes, I can imagine voting to delete something which 20:20 hindsight has deemed non-notable; why not? For instance, I'm looking forward to the AfDs a year or two from now where a lot of pop culture fad articles become vulnerable, when people realize how desperately unencyclopedic many are. We're entitled to change our minds, and furthermore we shouldn't be afraid to do so as situations warrant. RGTraynor 00:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since it doesn't mention a broadcast network or a definite starting broadcast time, delete for now.Once more tangible, specific information about broadcasting comes to light, the article can be recreated. If the broadcasting network is identified, redirect the article to the page for the network... at least until there are definite broadcasting plans for the series. B.Wind 03:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this show is on NBC's schedule for this fall, scheduled for Mondays at 9pm. [2] It's definitely legit. MikeWazowski 05:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 11:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per MikeWazowski. —phh (t/c) 18:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Network TV show + Actors I have heard of = Notable RicDod 19:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've seen photoshoots for the show already and for the same reasons from above.Bluemoonnstars
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.