Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero Certified Burgers (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 23:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Hero Certified Burgers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like an advertisement written primarily by two people on different years (Northamerica1000 and originally created by Pocopocopocopoco) Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't look like an advertisement. And the claim that "written primarily by two people on different years" seems quite bizarre as a reason to delete. Lots of articles are written mostly by one person in one year. So what? Andrew (talk) 09:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, this article has introduced me to poutine which sounds quite disgusting! I see they do salmon burgers too, which I've written about but don't fancy either. Chacun à son goût. Andrew (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - In addition to the multiple WP:RS in the article, I've found this from Canada Business Review, and there are certainly far more offline pieces as well. The article is also not really that much of an advert, in the grand scheme of things. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - The topic passes WP:CORPDEPTH per the independent, reliable sources in the article that provide significant coverage. Furthermore, the article is written in an encyclopedic manner with a neutral point-of-view. NorthAmerica1000 10:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG and support an article. Gong show 15:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.