Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermiverous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hermiverous[edit]

Delete 0 google hits, Possibly a made up word Joelito 02:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not listed in the OED, so it is very likely to be a hoax. Delete. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 03:11, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ruby 03:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. No trace of it. PJM 04:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Is Hoaxerific a word? --light darkness^(talk) 04:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as made up word, hoax. --Ter e nc e Ong 05:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as being non-cromulent. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' per nom. TheRingess 06:11, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and close debate; we've reached consensus. Daniel Case 06:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone. Arbustoo 09:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination and others. TVXPert 15:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.