Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermitech Laboratory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hermitech Laboratory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:CORP. Zero hits in google news archive. The creator of the article left a message regarding notability when he contested a CSD two years ago, but as far as I can tell he argues just that the company was listed in a few directory-type lists (see Talk:Hermitech Laboratory). Pcap ping 23:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 23:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 23:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - directory entries with W3C don't establish notability. I can find no coverage about this company. -- Whpq (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have also searched for coverage of this company, and I've come up empty. I've also looked up its products and can't find anything significant there either. -- Atama頭 17:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete small software company with a niche line of products. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to build an article. Icewedge (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting relist Left comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ukraine#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermitech Laboratory. Editors there should be allowed time to respond. My concern is that absence of evidence of Google footprint for a Ukrainian org (Cyrilic alphabet) may not imply evidence of absence of notability. Power.corrupts (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Their web page is only in English, so I don't even know how they spell the company name in Russian or Ukrainian. I'll delsort to the Ukrainian queue, just in case. A news search for their url failed to find anything either. Pcap ping 08:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 00:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it does not appear to be notable. JBsupreme (talk) 01:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 08:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.