Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermagenesis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hermagenesis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted by PROD in February 2009. Appears to be a made up word - I cannot find any references except to this article, the deleted article, or a young lady called Herma Genesis. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I PRODded it the first time it cropped up leading to its deletion then, and remain of the strong view that it is a brand-new neologism if not an outright hoax. Glenfarclas (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Interesting concept, but probably implausible. It doesn't help that there's no information on this to be found anywhere and I've never heard of it before. Insorak ♫ talk 20:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Made-up word. I don't think the process it describes exists. Narayanese (talk) 00:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.