Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heresiarch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. — _Maggot^Syn 00:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heresiarch

Non notable term, heresy allready covers this, and transwiki or merge anything useful, blatant unsourced original research Myheartinchile (talk) 00:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep expands on the dicdef and provides examples of what it is and how it differs from heresy more generally; just a stub but notable and the subject is worthy of a (better) article. JJL (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily sourced. It could be merged with heresy or specifically Christian heresy with which it is most associated, but there are enough key figures who have been tarred with the label to warrant an article. --Dhartung | Talk 03:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...liiiike?Myheartinchile (talk) 04:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per JJL. I see the seeds of a better article within this stub. Jclemens (talk) 04:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, an obviously important historical subject. Everyking (talk) 08:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.