Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hepburn Bio Care

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hepburn Bio Care[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable company. References only show that the company exists, not that it is notable. Biker Biker (talk) 08:14, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the citations link to an RS with a website. The periodicals cited do not show up in a web search. Also, the username of the author starts with "Hbc" making me think he is a corporate insider. Ebikeguy (talk) 20:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Since when do citations have to be available on the web? WP:V requires that information be verifiable. It doesn't require that it be easily verifiable.--v/r - T P 17:54, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing notable on Google and Yahoo.SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.