Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hepa-Flo (vacuum bags)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Numatic International. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 17:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hepa-Flo (vacuum bags)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As to be expected, a minor product for a vacuum is highly unlikely to receive the coverage required for an article. I attempted to boldly redirect to the parent company Numatic International but it was contested. I am proposing to delete and redirect as it has no independent notability for a stand alone article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 14:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 14:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Numatic International or delete it's so obviously not notable that there really shouldn't have needed to be an AfD for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by adamant1 (talk • contribs)
Redirect - Not a whiff of notability. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.