Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Seeley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 01:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Seeley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:notability. Google searches not finding anything significant in WP:reliable sources. Disputed prod noq (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak, Weak Keep. I've added refs to the article as I've found some references, but they are very weak refs. The Dove Awards don't keep old nominations anywhere on their website, only winners. There are web pages with nominations, but none that are really reliable. Bgwhite (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The number of views on the Youtube channel of a person does not seem to me a valid criteria of notability for that person (at least regarding the notability necessary for being in an encyclopedia). This article do almost nothing more than listing the songs produced by this artist. So for me it is clearly promotional and it violates WP:SPIP and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I also want to point out the fact that the articles which deal with the albums of this artist are almost empty of content (apart from the tracklist) which strengthen the general impression of non notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OysterMaster (talk • contribs) 02:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:BIO. lacks indepth coverage in independent sources, ie outside Christian media. LibStar (talk) 04:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.