Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Beresford, 9th Marquess of Waterford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Marquess of Waterford. Liz Read! Talk! 18:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Beresford, 9th Marquess of Waterford[edit]

Henry Beresford, 9th Marquess of Waterford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:ANYBIO due to a lack of in-depth secondary coverage from reliable sources. Marquesses are not inherently notable (also see AfD precedents), and this particular one never sat in the House of Lords, so WP:NPOL doesn't apply here either.

My personal source assessment follows:

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Pilaz
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Patrick Freyne (2 May 2015). "Oh lord: next generation takes the keys to Waterford county". Irishtimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2016. ~ WP:INTERVIEW Yes Yes ~ Partial
"Henry Nicholas de la Poer Beresford, 9th marquess of Waterford, * 1958". Geneall.net. Retrieved 30 March 2016. No WP:UGS No
"About". Le Poer Polo. 19 August 1987. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 30 March 2016. No No Yes No
https://www.thephoenix.ie/article/earl-of-tyrones-tipple-richard-beresford/ No seems to only have a short snippet about the subject of the article, since the article appears to focus on his son No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Pilaz (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.