Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Fexeus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (actually fairly close to an outright keep). The article has been given a few references that give merit to the case for notability, even though the "keep" voters acknoweledge that improvement is needed. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Henrik Fexeus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article not sutible for an article Mdann52 (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As a TV-host, etc, this person should be eligible for WP:CREATIVE etc, but that is not yet demonstrated. Delete, unless new references are provided.Squareanimal (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not demonstrate notability; doesn't meet WP:GNG either. CyanGardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 00:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The current article is unimpressive but, even so, cites two reasonably substantial articles from major Swedish newspapers. The corresponding Swedish Wikipedia article seems rather better and cites more sources - we might well be better off with a translation of that rather than the current article, but that is a matter of editing. PWilkinson (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The two sources used in the English article so far are from the daily newspapers in Sweden with the largest and the third largest circulation. This article is from another of the major Swedish newspapers. A search for "Henrik Fexeus" in sv:Mediearkivet ("The Media Archive"), which collects articles from a number of Swedish newspapers, gives 1753 hits. I looked a the first ten or so and, yes, they seem to be all about him (it's not a common name). Most of them will mention him only in passing, of course, or as part of their tv guides, but significant coverage in a number of the major Swedish newspapers has already been linked to, so ... /Julle (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and maybe I should add: the coverage is of course about him in his role as television host and writer. /Julle (talk) 15:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - even though the article itself is badly written and makes no mention of his appearance on Swedens got talent. He is a notable figure.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.