Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell, Arizona
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was superseded by complete overhaul of the article without reference to the original topic. The original article has for all intents and purposes been removed from the article, consistent with the unanimous wishes of the contributors to this discussion. non-admin closure by nominator, Skomorokh 00:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hell, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unverified article; the existence of the subject has not been confirmed by reliable sources and has been questioned on the talk page. Skomorokh 23:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Likely hoax. Nothing about it here:[1] or here:[2]. Fences and windows (talk) 02:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems like a hoax. Can't find any info showing it was an actual town. And as Yuma is literally on the border with California, a town being between the two seems impossible. --Oakshade (talk) 07:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete How lame is that? If you're going to do a hoax, you should at least make it interesting. We have enough stubs about real things that are as boring as the name of this town. One might as well try to do a hoax about an American postage stamp, because there have been lots of books about ghost towns. Nobody has ever seen or heard this one, not even Jennifer Love-Hewitt. Mandsford (talk) 12:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as obvious hoax. —Wrathchild (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete stupid hoax. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even if true, not a notable ghost town per my standards. Bearian (talk) 18:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.