Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helium Systems (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Helium Systems[edit]

Helium Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about blockchain company - unrelated to the blogging company that previously owned helium.com (which was previously deleted at AFD). Content is substantially from SPAs. VentureBeat source is about fundraising (which is not usable for notability), and TechCrunch is a yellow-rated source at WP:RSP that is specifically not a source of notability. A WP:BEFORE on "Helium Systems" shows press releases, low-level churnalism, crypto blogs and some funding rounds; no independent RS coverage that would supply WP:CORPDEPTH necessary to meet WP:CORP, and no sign of meeting WP:GNG. I'd be happy to be shown wrong, but it would have to be shown with independent RS coverage. David Gerard (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. As noted, sources covering fundraising alone do nothing to support encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 21:35, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Advert of a blockchain company. Absolutely fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP. GermanKity (talk) 12:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, buzzword spam.--Mvqr (talk) 12:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.