Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Keller National Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Keller National Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The {{articleissues}} at the top of the article sums it all up. This text is written by someone with what seems to be a close connection (the creator's talk page has warnings for spamming with a similar article), it's unsourced except to the organisation's own website, and there's no indication of notability — time to blow it up. See the state of the article before I edited it. I've done my best to clean it up, but it doesn't appear to be repairable further, due to the seeming nonexistence of reliable sources available online, so even if you reject the blow-it-up argument, you need to think about the lack of reliable source coverage. Nyttend (talk) 02:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, following improvements by Thincat. Even now, the sourcing isn't great - but it seems adequate for notability. PWilkinson (talk) 21:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sufficient sourcing already showing in the footnotes for a GNG pass as the object of multiple instances of independently published coverage in so-called reliable sources. Carrite (talk) 03:58, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Under WP:NONPROFIT, this org is both (a) scope of activities is national, AND (b) information is verifiable in multiple third-party independent reliable sources. Other factors include size & longevity, and establishment by act of Congress, that suggest the organization's notability. ... Note: Searching in Google Books provides lots of additional cites, in US government materials and in references about Helen Keller, disability, and education -- quite a lot of them. --Lquilter (talk) 08:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve because it passes both points 1 and 2 of WP:NONPROFIT. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.