Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Berggruen (artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Berggruen (artist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist of questionable notability that does not claim significant notability in the article. Article previously consisted of a significant copyright infringement before getting a straight infusion from the german wikipedia. Hasteur (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —AllyD (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The main reference is to an article largely relating to her art collector father. Although the external link gives a reasonably long exhibition list, neither there or in Google Book search is there clear evidence of notability in her own right. AllyD (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:GNG. I added the references from the German Wikipedia back in April in an attempt to fix the copyright infringement and thinking the article can be improved with further sources since I remember there were some newspaper articles apart from the current sources. However, I cant find any reliable source with more than a passing mention now, so I think it fails WP:GNG. Nimuaq (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.