Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Bootle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi Bootle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO, looks like a resume, her highest posting is consul general, ambassadors are not inherently notable, let alone consuls. LibStar (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find news articles mentioning her in her political position, but nothing that rises to the level of notability. LaMona (talk) 04:51, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As stated by the above folks, the pickings are scarce. Her government positions don't provide presumed notability, and other coverage is of the routine variety. I found nothing other than the single reference in the article (the original is also still available online) --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.