Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedgewars (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2014 February 20.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4. The article was speedily deleted by admin RHaworth (talk · contribs), who also salted the title. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 20:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hedgewars[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not cite any reliable sources to satisfy notability criteria. Could not find any reviews or whatnot from satisfactory sites. Was previously deleted through AfD, endorsed through deletion review, but then was recreated anyway. Marasmusine (talk) 23:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete and salt. I've tagged the page as a repost. I'd really recommend that this get salted, as it's been deleted about 3-4 times now and is likely to get re-created. I have a feeling that much of the editing has been done by people who have been involved with the game at some level, so this would be necessary not only because someone might re-create it but also because there's a bit of a spammy feel to the article as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to any admins coming in to check this: while the current article is longer, it addresses none of the issues brought up in the prior AfD or shows that it passes notability guidelines as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definitely has a spammy/promotional feel to it. It looks like the developers are using Wikipedia as their own personal wiki. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.