Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedgediving

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete'. Tito xd^(?!?) 05:29, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hedgediving

Non notable, not encyclopedic. Molotov (talk)
15:57, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - hoax or possible vanity, only very slightly funny. Naturenet | Talk 15:58, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Slightly amusing but not encyclopaedic. Eddie.willers 18:01, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not sure if it qualifies as even "slightly" amusing.--SarekOfVulcan 18:03, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Though my vote also goes out to slightly amusing. Ifnord 20:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm easily amused, but that's not enough. -- Captain Disdain 20:23, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It does happen, but not as a competitive sport, usually just bored teenagers terrorising pensioners. Do all forms of hooligan activity get an article? --Cactus.man ✍ 06:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a sport with a lot of google hits. It is now well-established and merits a reference. This claptrap about hooliganism is deletionist. Joaquin Murietta 07:30, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see just 378 reported hits, and only 105 actual hits. Sorry, but I don't think that counts as "a lot". Haeleth 14:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.