Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hebari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hebari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability failure. Current references are blogs/self-published or passing mentions of the dojo. No other significant coverage found in reliable third-party sources. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:05, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Within the Japanese rope bondage community Hebari well known and respected, as evidenced by articles in Nawapedia and SMPedia, both of which are closed web publications and not open to self publishing. Also with interviews by multiple publications around the world including Skin two magazine (physical magazine), Slang Bleu and Something you said, none of which allow self publishing. All of these references are stated in the article. http://smpedia.com/index.php?title=Hebari http://sangbleu.com/2013/02/22/interview-with-hebari/ http://nawapedia.com/index.php?title=Hebari http://somethingyousaid.com/2014/05/07/interview-hebari-from-sydney-rope-dojo/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.200.59.30 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 3 July 2014

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 08:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. AlanS (talk) 07:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG does not appear to me to be met. The Skin Two reference is from a source we'd generally consider reliable, and it does provide signficant coverage, but it's not independent as an interview. Even if that were not the case, we'd need another source with a similar level of editorial oversight. And of course, much as we don't allow Wikipedia itself to be used as a source, other sources relying on third-party contributions without sufficient oversight (even IMDB), don't work under our policies either. Additional sources welcome, of course. --j⚛e decker ^talk 21:20, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.