Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy on Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy on Wrestling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for non notable professional wrestling promotion. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Just a small local promotion HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:CORP. Nikki♥311 21:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Two news articles, citations 2 and 4, are sourced to the promotion's article. I also found articles from the Pro Wrestling Torch [1] and WDIO [2]. 72.74.200.86 (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source 1 doesn't work. Source 2, OWOW profile about a wrestler. Source 3, works fine. Source 4, doesn't work.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources that I have found seem too WP:ROUTINE to cover GNG concerns.LM2000 (talk) 06:50, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.