Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaven Without Love
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 16:47, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Heaven Without Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 17:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 18:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 18:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Procedural Keep - Bad faith nomination, one of two made in a single minute. WP:BEFORE is being flouted and (semi-)automation abused. Carrite (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well I had a rough look and I couldn't find any third party sources talking about this article. Also, the Serbian version has no references, just like this article.
- Suggest delete or redirect into film maker. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:NFILM #4, preserved by the Croatian national archive [1]. Daß Wölf 00:00, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also WP:NFILM states "These criteria are presented as rules of thumb for easily identifying films that Wikipedia should probably have articles about. In almost all cases, a thorough search for independent, third-party reliable sources will be successful for a film meeting one or more of these criteria. However, meeting these criteria is not an absolute guarantee that Wikipedia should have a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to the film." --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- The article isn't of encyclopedic value at all. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 22:32, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Wolfy. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. on the basis that we are normally extremely inclusive for verifiable films. DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.