Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Joy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Bduke (talk) 06:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heather Joy[edit]
- Heather Joy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable model whose only claim to fame is appearing on SuicideGirls. Fails WP:BIO; no independent, reliable, third-party sources, just MySpace, Crave, blogs, etc. Article is likely WP:COI or autobiography.Delete. MCB (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not really a model, published photographer, and accomplished web designer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gogogo12 (talk • contribs)
- Web designers are not usually considered notable, unless there is substantial third-party references or comment on their work. As for "published photographer", where is her work published? Is it self-published (i.e. on a web site)? If she has had notable gallery or museum shows, they should be referenced. MCB (talk) 18:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Portland Mercury, Village Voice are fine references. Da-rb (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Having photos of oneself on Flikr and MySpace etc. doesn't scream out notability. Can't find any sources. I suspect this is more self-publicity. Camillus (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, borderline advertising, no indication of genuine notability. Tim Vickers (talk) 03:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep appears to have enough reliable sources to pass general notability. Admittedly not by much. Article needs cleanup, and I'm not sure how much of the article will be left after the fluffiness is removed. Horrorshowj (talk) 23:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.