Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heath Lane
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 10:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Heath Lane[edit]
- Heath Lane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable subject fails WP:MUSIC criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia The Real Libs-speak politely 20:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —I'mperator 20:38, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:Music. No coverage. No reliable sources. No idea why it should stay. Wperdue (talk) 22:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]
- Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 23:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for COI or notability, and then recruit the editor for more constructive work. Not bad for a first band article. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 08:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.