Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hearts of Jesus and Mary Parish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 06:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hearts of Jesus and Mary Parish[edit]

Hearts of Jesus and Mary Parish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded with the addition of a facebook and blog reference. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that it passes WP:GNG. Simply another local church. Onel5969 TT me 12:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 19:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 19:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 19:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article should not have been flagged for deletion. The editor needs direction to find local print materials. WP's "Find sources" is obviously insufficient for articles related to the Philippines--Google Books, JSTOR, etc. to date only includes materials from US & European libraries. Prburley (talk)
  • Delete - clearly fails WP:GNG and lacks reliable sources. Just another local church, and a relatively new one at that. No historic or encyclopedic notability here. Shelbystripes (talk) 03:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Like most local churches this looks utterly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.