Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hearts in 5 years

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hearts in 5 years

Someone's opinions about a football club. Not encyclopedic. DJ Clayworth 20:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, it is POV.--Adam ^(talk) 21:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; non-encyclopedic babble. PJM 21:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:NOT a publisher of original thought, be it incoherent babbling or not. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 21:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this, um, 'future history' of Hearts football club as breaching verifiability, among many other guidelines. Sliggy 21:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-encyclopædic article, violates WP:NPOV - babbling opinion from the author. They can start a blog for the same effect. (aeropagitica) 21:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete crystalballism Flower party■ 21:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-per all of the above. Captain Jackson 22:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.