Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hearts from the Somme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hearts from the Somme[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable future film, does not meet WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 12:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete This upcoming film has generated no coverage. The author's user page tells us it is in pre-production, and paragraph 3 of WP:NFF is not met. Further, the article's author has a username issue, and his User page itself imitates an article. Userfy back to author if requested, but ONLY if his username issue is addressed and he is made aware of WP:COI. Send him to WP:PRIMER. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 15:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFF by a wide margin. --Finngall ^talk 16:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable and WP:NFF. Malke 2010 (talk) 00:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Zero coverage in reliable sources. Only hits I could find are to the film's website (actually a Blogspot blog) and to an independent film movie database. No prejudice against recreation if it gets reliable coverage in the future. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
'"no delete"' this film is the second to potray the battle of the Somme atone of the hardest film to make according to the director — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.2.118 (talk) 03:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.