Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heart Machine (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rademacher (band). JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heart Machine (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails notability criteria for albums. Independet released albums are generally not notable and no source contradicts this. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 17:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The band itself seems to pass on notability, so we might consider redirecting this album title to the band's article at Rademacher (band). UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rademacher (band) I suppose. The release isn't notable, but the band are, so as a likely search term it should be redirected (per the guidelines at WP:NALBUM). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. It does not appear to be independently notable; it's just a track listing and an infobox of an independent release. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 03:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.