Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthjump

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:19, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Healthjump

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing enough to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. A few low quality sources, tons of press releases, some minor funding news, etc. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability not clearly established. [1] is the only reliable source and is local so doesn't satisy WP:CORPDEPTH. Other refs are directory listing or not independent/reliable. The only other thing I found was this which is nichy and technical and again doesn't really help with WP:CORPDEPTH. ~Kvng (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is also a somewhat newly founded company with only press releases and mentions as their sources, no solid signs of notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, small start-up with modest ($1.8 million) funding and some press (my news search [2] , just not enough . E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.