Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazem Shoukry Designs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hazem Shoukry Designs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company that does not meet WP:CORP. The author's supposed references are not helpful - four of them do not even mention Hazem Shoukry Designs, the fifth is clearly not a reliable, independent, published source. The claims of notability are suspicious. For example, despite several searches I cannot find any evidence that Hazem Shoukry has been interviewed by the BBC. Unless the claims to notability can be supported with sources, there is nothing to suggest this company should be covered in a Wikipedia article. Sparthorse (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 18:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The references ARE reliable , the first one (florida designs) - the company's name's written if u SCROLL down. In the third reference (sonesta hotel) if you open the link and scroll down, under the sub-title "Executive floors" you will find a picture, in the picture there's a window in the top that is made by hazem shoukry designs. in the fifth reference, the company made the WHOLE building! - and by the way no hotel whatsoever would write the name of the company that made their building. about the BBC interview, we have the full CD. i can upload it on youtube for anyone to see. the rest of the references i'll post their details where you can find the company's work quickly. Farah26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farah26 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message body http://www.marriott.com/hotels/photo-tours.mi?marshaCode=caijw&pageID=HWGLF&imageID=7&roomTypeCode= The Castle Club (360°) thats the link for the " JW marriot" . open the link and see it for yourself. scroll up the image ( move up) you will see a glass ceiling. it is considered one of the biggest and finest glass domes in the world. --Farah26 (talk) 19:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Number 15 in the link " http://www.floridadesign.com/sourcefinder/category/architectural-stoneworks/" -which is a reference- is Hazem Shoukry Designs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farah26 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded in detail at Talk:Hazem Shoukry Designs. In short, none of these are close to being reliable sources. Sparthorse (talk) 19:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

does that mean that the page will be deleted ? --Farah26 (talk) 20:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion will run for seven days. During that time any editor is welcome to contribute to the discussion. During that time you, or anyone else, can provide reliable sources to show how the subject of this article is notable. This would be taken into account by the editors commenting here. At the end of seven days, an editor (usually an administrator) will close the discussion and decide whether or not the article should be deleted. You can find more details of the process at WP:AFD. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Open this link: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hazem-Shoukry-Designs/303407606336263?sk=wall and you'll find the interview with BBC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farah26 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 18:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking significant coverage in multiple independent third party sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if these are added to the page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.