Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazeltons (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Justin Vernon. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hazeltons[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reopening due to no other participants in the last discussion, but the notability problems I addressed last time still remain. See the last discussion for the reasons on why I've nominated this. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 17:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 17:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect as none of this suggests better applocable notability. SwisterTwister talk 17:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Justin Vernon. I can't find sufficient evidence the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.