Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley Aitken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 11:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hayley Aitken[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is sourced to a myspace account and to a link to listen to a work by Aitken. None of the sources are remotely close to being reliable indepdent sources that would show the coverage neccesary to demonstrate that she is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Top forty hit. Member of notable band. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article now has a ref to verify Australian charting. Passes WP:MUSICBIO#2.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Charting artist. Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable musician.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.