Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayes Robertson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete as hoax. D e athphoenix ʕ 14:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hayes Robertson

Appears to be a hoax. This guy is a Chicago investment banker? Check [1] and look at the first result. --CrypticBacon 12:52, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also check out a Google search for "Atlantic Strategies Group" with which he is alleged to have been involved. The second result is ~~this article~~ the Wikipedia article from which this information was, "extracted"? I can't tell, give it a look. Confusing edit history here... --CrypticBacon 12:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, possibly Speedily an article tagged for cleanup and as a hoax while referred for deletion that doesn't have any sources and is in any case non-notable MLA 13:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Florida Profit

ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP, INC.

PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 4521 PGA BLVD. #246 PALM BEACH GARDENS FL 33418

MAILING ADDRESS 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD SUITE 181 BOCA RATON FL 33496 google hayes robertson, gop or republican or strategist

Changed 04/30/2005

Document Number P04000070523 FEI Number 371494837 Date Filed 04/29/1996 State FL Status ACTIVE Effective Date NONE

Registered Agent Name & Address ROBERTSON, HAYES 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD SUITE 181 BOCA RATON FL 33496 Address Changed: 04/30/2005

Commment What is the source of this information? Why, if you enter "Atlantic Strategies Group" into Google does it only return one result that says this "group" is based in New Jersey (not Florida)? Is it because the group isn't notable, maybe? --CrypticBacon 23:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- So, this guy is a "GOP political strategist and a member of the Campbell County Republican Executive Committee."? Not notable, sorry. --CrypticBacon 23:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.