Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayes Grier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 14:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hayes Grier

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claim to fame is making vine videos-not sure if that quite goes under notability. Wgolf (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-also it seems to be a issue of him being a younger brother of someone else. Now I'm not sure how we handle people from vine though. Maybe someday he might become bigger. But not yet. Wgolf (talk) 21:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 07:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not believe he has met Wikipedia's Notability standards at this time. Stesmo (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of significant coverage about him in reliable sources. Yes, his brother is likely notable, but his brother has gotten more coverage in reliable sources, and notability is not inheritable from a sibling. —C.Fred (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-looks like this article might need a protection lock until this gets resolved considering constat vandalism that happens. Wgolf (talk) 04:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. Article silverlocked for two weeks. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.