Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden Zammit (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:33, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hayden Zammit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am completing this page on behalf of User:180.216.99.150 who placed the AfD banner on the article. ... discospinster _talk 18:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding User:180.216.99.150 rationale for deletion below that he placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden Zammit [1] --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I nominate him for deletion.

yes he won the OAM, but since thats the only noteworthy aspect he deserves a reference on THAT wikipedia page, and not this vanity page which reads like a resume that lists every single award he got in highschool. Plus he's done basically nothing noteworthy since leaving highschool so definitely should delete and just mention him in the OAM page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.216.99.150 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Winning an award is notable, but in itself, does not make the subject sufficiently notable to pass WP:BIO. WP:1E also applies.- Mr X 18:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The OAM is a worthy award, but nowhere near conferring inherent notability per WP:ANYBIO. I agree with MrX that WP:1E is also relevant. Frickeg (talk) 04:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -Impressive accomplishment but not all that notable. Strongly agree that WP:ANYBIO applies. 4twenty42o (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks notoriety. Totally vain. WP:BIO. sig1068 — Preceding undated comment added 00:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is no way the OAM should be used as a standard for notability – it's awarded to hundreds of people each year, and is the lowest grade in its order. IgnorantArmies 14:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.