Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden Chisholm (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hayden Chisholm[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notabilty. Not enough sources for an article of substance. Vmavanti (talk) 00:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 01:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 01:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Found a few more refs (added to page). Seems to be many more out there? Found coverage of his tours, nominations and records with notable labels see WP:NMUSIC. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 02:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)).[reply]
Keep due to refs added by Dushan Jugum; it needs some work, but they are notable --DannyS712 (talk) 03:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.