Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hay Amores (Telenovela)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hay Amores (Telenovela)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this telenovela is notable MathewTownsend (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've searched extensively and I cannot find any verification that this show even exists, or that it is planned for the future. The closest title match is "Hay Amores Que Matan", clearly not the subject of the article based on the credits. Venevisión doesn't list it as an ongoing show nor in the historical archive (although it would seem that that archive is not comprehensive), and according to this note from them, Raquel Yánez, who supposedly stars the show, debuted on Venevisión just recently on Válgame Dios, an ongoing telenovela. I've reviewed the other articles created by Cines12345 (talk · contribs) and, while they are poorly referenced or have no references at all, I've been able to at least determine that the shows are real. I suppose they might have based the content of this article on a forum post or something similar (although I wasn't able to find anything of that sort either), so I'm hesitant to call this a blatant hoax. The author was notified of this AfD so I hope they might come to explain the content. I'll review and try to fix the other articles if possible later tonight — Frankie (talk) 17:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.