Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haxxxor
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Majorly (o rly?) 13:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Haxxxor[edit]
Results of the previous vote can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haxxxor movies.
Delete: Non-notable niche pornographic movie Tarcieri 18:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. --Easyas12c 21:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? -- Ben 16:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The movie is about many well known security tools. Nmap, probably being the most notable of the tools, has mentioned the movie on its web site [1]. Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors) states that a pornographic actor is notable enough for Wikipedia, if 4. Performer has been notable or prolific within a specific genre niche. The genre of porn that introduces real computer security in an educational way is a new one, which makes the actors inherently notable within it. How ever I think having all of the information in one article makes more sense than creating a separate article for each of the actresses. --Easyas12c 21:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors) is concerned in respect to being "notable or prolific within a specific genre niche", the list of pornographic sub-genres linked does not include "pornography demonstrating the use of network security tools". Pornographic niches are defined in terms of sexual acts, not mixtures between porn and non-porn related topics. HaXXXoR is perhaps the only film attempting to combine these topics, and therefore does not in and of itself constitute a pornographic niche. (perhaps I wasn't apt in describing this as a "niche pornographic movie." If there exists a hacker porn niche, this film is it) Tarcieri 05:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The movie is about many well known security tools. Nmap, probably being the most notable of the tools, has mentioned the movie on its web site [1]. Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors) states that a pornographic actor is notable enough for Wikipedia, if 4. Performer has been notable or prolific within a specific genre niche. The genre of porn that introduces real computer security in an educational way is a new one, which makes the actors inherently notable within it. How ever I think having all of the information in one article makes more sense than creating a separate article for each of the actresses. --Easyas12c 21:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? -- Ben 16:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article reads as a promo. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 17:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Purgatory Fubar. - PatricknoddyTALK (reply here)|HISTORY 22:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Distribution of film very low, only Nmap article links to this page, all others are just page redirects and WP namespace items, article looks like a promo, article is riddled with NPOV, lack of cultural signifigence (either in porno industry or hacker industry), E.g. no noms from AVN awards, not stocked at Porno DVD "netflix" sites, lack of acceptability in hacker scene ( see Google Search, etc. Hackajar 01:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.