Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haven, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haven, California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is another odd cock-up on the part of GNIS, because the name on the topo maps is quite plainly "Little Haven". And if you search for that phrase, you get a number of hits which explain that it is a sort of stop on the Pacific Crest Trail where you can get some assistance. Which is to say, it's one of several ordinary houses on the spot. "Haven", as far as I can tell, was never anything at all other than a failure to copy what's on the map correctly. Mangoe (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Google News search only about other "Havens" in California. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 20:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG Spiderone 14:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.