Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatta Solar Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 00:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hatta Solar Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a solar project seems to be native advertising for a energy company by a now blocked suspected undisclosed paid editor. The project was a minor affair - fitting solar panels to 560 properties and the coverage reflects that with the coverage in The National being the only significant piece . The rest of the coverage is in niche publications and reads like slightly adapted press releases. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Unless it can be salvaged into something, perhaps merge to have a mention in the Hatta page Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 08:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree that the alleged sources are most likely just regurgitating a press release by the company, and are then in turn used to try to legitimise this article. Ultimately it's about a non-notable, run-of-the-mill solar power project, of no interest to anyone but the company involved, and providing no encyclopaedic value. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 05:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.