Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatching (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 07:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hatching (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film fails WP:NFF. Nothing notable on the film's production. It is WP:TOOSOON and include elements of WP:CRYSTALBALL, such as " The plan is to first release the feature film at a major international festival in 2021 before releasing it in cinemas and VOD platforms."

And as WP:FFILM noted, we should ask this question: "does the topic under discussion have the in-depth and persistent coverage in multiple reliable sources over an extended period of time so as to be presumable as "worthy of note"?"

In this case clearly NOT. Kolma8 (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It seems unfair to me that with people like me who dedicate their time to creating articles about foreign films, they have to deal with this kind of thing. It has started again what could be called a "witch hunt" only for having reversed one of your deletion proposals as it was considered wrong. Do not take it personally, instead of continuing to nominate my articles take some time and think if they really deserve to be deleted or if it is just an unnecessary desire to conflict with me regardless of whether the articles in question really deserve or not be on Wikipedia. Bruno Vargas _{Eñe'ẽ avec moi} 16:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure exactly what you mean referring for "a witch hunt"...but I would not nominate an article for deletion if I would not think that it must be deleted. And it seems that the community disagree with me. So, lets keep it civil and agree to disagree. Thank you. Kolma8 (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've left a note about the above comment. As far as the article goes, I've found some coverage in Finnish but what is needed is some coverage about the production/filming. I've really only found announcements that the casting process, which is frustrating. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:10, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I've found some coverage for the casting and some reception of the trailer. I didn't see anything for the production, which is why this is a weak keep at best. I think that there may be just enough to justify NFF due to the coverage for the trailer, though. If this is to be deleted, I definitely think that this should be draftified since this will likely gain coverage once it releases. No guarantees, of course, hence the draftification if this closes as delete. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reviews in TheWrap and ScreenDaily. ——Serial 14:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per reviews in TheWrap and ScreenDaily. WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 11:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.