Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasselhoffed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hasselhoffed

Delete. This article was created by the same people who made the website Hasselhoffed. Seems they just want to try and start some internet fad. Furpee 11:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NOT the birthplace of fads. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 11:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn protologism and WP:NOT stuff made up in school. Esquizombi 11:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable neologism. JIP | Talk 12:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Bucketsofg 14:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with extreme prejudice and prevent it from being created again. Wikipedia is quickly becoming an attractive place for bored teenagers to promote their internet fads. Policy is clearly against neologisms and things made up in school one day. Brian G. Crawford, the so-called "Nancy Grace of AfD" 15:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism, non-verifiable, non-notable, and whatever else. Let Urban Dictionary take care of it. --E lkman - ^(talk) 16:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, attempting to use Wikipedia to make an internet meme notable, which destroys the whole process. --Hamiltonian 18:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above; non-notable and neologism --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 20:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.