Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Elamragy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Elamragy[edit]

Hassan Elamragy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My before search was flooded with blatant paid-for interviews and self-promotion. The first reference in the article--a website that invites anybody to submit a piece[1]--isn't even close to being reliable and is likely written by the subject himself; the second reference is a (clearly paid for) interview; and my Google translate leads me to believe the two Arabic sources are much of the same. I also couldn't find evidence of a kickboxing or modelling career. – 2.O.Boxing 20:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Currently, I have put several sources, he is a rising actor and director, and she needs improvement, not deletion, according to my opinion Hichem algerino (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    A rising actor and director? But, I thought he's a 'kickboxer, model and content creator'? I'm probably gonna get a telling off, but this article absolutely stinks of UPE. – 2.O.Boxing 07:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PROMO, using vanity spam sites and others that are unreliable, possibly SEO sites. Oaktree b (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I see nothing that shows notability as a kickboxer or actor. I also don't see the significant independent coverage in reliable sources that are required to meet WP:GNG. Interviews and blog articles are not enough. Papaursa (talk) 00:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.